|
Comprehending the distinction between operational speed and strategic pace is an important ingredient to operating a successful business. Far too many company bosses focus excessively on accelerating the speed at which practical tasks are completed which provides accelerated costs, having a temporary gain in customer numbers and purchases, which can often sooner or later produce extreme detriment to the company, employee development along with the foundation of the panacea of all businesses, a simple and efficient, almost pleasurable customer experience. There are two main kinds of business with regards to speed of execution. The primary type has a sole priority of meeting deadlines, achieving temporary targets, that is definitely characterised through demands without ample time for understanding where the organisation is being taken. The other kind of company is the one that has a long-term perspective and grows all sectors of the business together, or at least in harness amongst each other. This generates a balance inside the growth and continuing development of the business enterprise and not just converts the buyer once they are actually captured, but adds the second ingredient, (according to Peter Drucker), of keeping them: a factor often forgotten. The former variety of company sees the best way to gain almost any edge on another company, and even their peers in that particular industry as a whole, is from doing many things quicker. As they lurch from one sales campaign to another one, they perpetuate the unpredictable rollercoaster of sales, customer numbers, profits, costs and staff turnover they currently experience, after which amplify the down-side repeatedly in their bid to "get ahead". The employees feel undervalued, working conditions are considered poor and stressful, and days lost due to "sickness" start creeping up. The culture is "do or die" and no-one enjoys their job anymore. The management start becoming reactive and scrutiny of people performing their role increases, as they look for somebody to blame. The second kind of business possesses a different outlook. They already have workplace and business values that run through whatever they do. Everyone in the company knows what their job is, how it is inserted to the great scheme of things and where their contribution is helping the business achieve its goals. Grievances are heard and taken care of openly and fairly. Sales are gained and customer support is supplied for every post-sales needs or servicing in an orderly and logical way. Sales are set up and new customers on-boarded with the knowledge that value is being added which will consequently produce greater prosperity for the business. This is not to suggest that the first type of company lacks leadership, most of the time they just do not. In some cases, the leadership is really so strong that it must be solely that which is holding the company together. More often than not it is far from the total amount of leadership which is present, however the direction that leadership is heading that produces the difficulties. Frequently these leaders are extremely busy working "in" the business, they just do not have time to work "on" the company. Also, I wouldn't dare declare that there's an inability to strategize inside the first form of companies, since there are often excellent strategists within most of these companies. The challenge seems to lie with the operational timescale that their strategies are planned over along with the inability of others to complete that strategy in the manner the originator intended: often strategies from different directors or partners are not always aligned, pulling in different directions. Now, I realise I will be only scratching the top of need as this challenge exists in up to 86% of companies sized from £1M to £100M profit pa. This topic, from strategy planning and strategy execution with long term perspective, incorporating "Conduct Risk" needs to be investigated by each firm having a view of exactly what it means to them specifically. There is significantly more to running a business than just increasing speed. For somebody who is doing a thing that isn't working, to increase speed falls into the definition of insanity, i.e., doing the exact same thing but expecting different results. By taking a step back and investing some time collaboratively using our specialist advice in identifying your optimal strategic goals in a sustainable pace. We can help you create longer-term infrastructure methods to help build and maintain company growth, expand margins, increase profits and ultimately produce a robust and valid "exit" or "final" value in a compliant and risk managed approach. At Compliance Consultant we will help you with a free of charge questionnaire and explanatory PDF at http://www.complianceconsultant.org/pathfinder or just search "Pathfinder Evolution Compliance" and join the select collection of companies benefiting and cashing in on this specialist planning, many are in the financial services industry. We operate under complete non-disclosure agreements to safeguard your confidentiality.
Related Articles -
balance score card, balance scorecard, balanced score card, balanced scorecard, bank set up, banking compliance, boe, bank of england, bsc, business continuity,
| 
