|
Hip resurfacing, seen as the alternative to total hip arthroplasty, has been thought to be safer because it helps conserve the bones instead of replacing them, but recent study reveals that women may not benefit from the said operation unlike men. Although the procedure is not entirely new, it was first done in the 1950s to help those who were suffering from arthritis. The procedure did not end well but the recent results showed that patients who have had the procedure were less likely to experience dislocation and fractures. This made men and women who were suffering from joint pain grab the opportunity to undergo the procedure in order to experience pain relief. In osteoarthritis, the cartilage that protects the joints from grinding into each other is broken down. Up until today, there is no single cause for this medical condition but an interaction of several factors. As the cartilage decreases, the person will lose the natural shock absorber of the joint, which then allows the two bones to rub together creating pain and discomfort in the long run. Eventually, this may lead to the damage of the surface of the joint. The operation stemmed from the idea of preserving the bone that is not affected by arthritis which gave birth to the concept of just replacing the surface of the hip joint. The success of this surgery resulted to the increased number of hip resurfacing performed to both men and women which was originally thought to help them get rid of the pain but will not limit their active lifestyle. This was seen as a better option for younger patients who are keen on preserving their hip bone. Unlike the total hip replacement surgery where the head and neck of the femur is removed, the neck of the femur is retained in hip resurfacing. A metal cap is then inserted in the preserved bone but is sculpted before it is inserted. In terms of recovery, patients who received hip resurfacing recover much faster than those who have had total hip replacement. The advantage of retaining more bones makes it possible for succeeding hip operations to be more successful, especially for younger patients who might have another operation. It is also possible to make larger ball size that helps improve movement and stability, thus reducing the incidence of dislocation. Although there are also some disadvantages that were seen, such as the spread of metal ions due to the wear and tear of the implants. This may cause infection and allergy but this problem is not only confined to capping the femur but also in all-metal hip replacements. DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement cases were filed due to allegations of metal poisoning from these implants. The DePuy Pinnacle Lawsuit Information Center at depuypinnaclelawsuit.com may be able to provide you more information about the updates on these cases.
Related Articles -
hip surgery, depuy pinnacle, hip implants, hip replacement, joint pain, THR,
|
