|
Dumb question, won’t you agree? Of course, photography can be both. From the time it was discovered in the early part of the nineteenth century, the art and science of photography has gone a long, long way. It is very unfortunate that the first ever photograph may no longer be viewed even by those ahead of us since it was destroyed by accident not long after it came into being (reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_photography). It is worth noting that we are extremely lucky to have experienced the effortlessness of today’s photography. In those early times, images cannot be captured if they do not stay within the camera view field, unmoving, for at least ten minutes as it was the “exposure time” duration then. Photography normally begins as a happy experience for the first-timer. It then develops into a somewhat expensive hobby. I remember how expensive it was when I made my first shots as an amateur. Then, you would have to buy rolls of film which cost a lot in my poor country. Technological advances in later years made photography less and less expensive. In today’s environment, “everything” is digital – from writing to computing, to photography and games. Things have become both easier and less expensive, despite the higher efficiency due to technology. But nevertheless, the art in photography is an important element to consider especially to hobbyists. Serious photography professionals also have to be artistic, though, in order for their artwork to be commercially viable. Let us talk about the hobbyist first. The hobbyist has art and money invested in photography. He is into experimenting with techniques and media. His finished products are for display to be appreciated and valued by friends and acquaintances. His self-esteem is more important than the commercial value of his photographic work. Some, however, appreciate it when offered a substantial amount for a particular work since it boosts his self-esteem. More of such “achievements” make him bask in his artistry and popularity, with some cash to boot. The professional is normally the more experienced and seasoned photographer. He is enterprising enough to make money out of his photography art and skills. He invests money in photography with the prime objective of making profits. He is more of a businessperson than an artist, but has the opportunity and common sense to enjoy the best of both worlds. Pushing a bit more forward puts him in the category of hard core businesspersons, when he puts up his own commercial photography and printing shop, employing the latest and therefore, the most time- and cost-efficient technologies. The professional who is a cross between the artist and the businessperson is the news correspondence type photographer. This kind is more concerned with the impact of his work on mass communication. He has to be artistic enough to be credible and impactful and shrewd enough to place high cash value on his work. Which kind of photographer are you? ?
Looking for great photos? Visit the Hotel">http://hotelphotographer.org">Hotel Photographer website and look through a range of great photos.
There are lots of great Photography">http://hotelphotographer.org/photography-websites">Photography Websites out there so have a good browse and find some inspiration today.
Related Articles -
Hotel, Photographer,
| 
