Backstory: In the summertime of '09 I went on epic travel. I started in Blaine, WA about the Canadian edge plus rode to San Ysidro, CA about the Mexican edge. Overall the travel was amazing. I owe everything to the bike maps I bought. At the same time I'd search at them each day plus think to myself "I might have gotten this all info for complimentary!" That will be the basis of this article. The maps I utilized were good overall. I absolutely have some complaints. In a nutshell the maps took all of the planning plus reduced it to almost nothing. The just planning I did connected to the route was certain distance data. Before I get into that I should commence with a description of the maps. These were bike maps considering of that these people were formatted to be read inside a bike chart owner that may hold one chart inside a creased state. That absolutely isn't much space. Especially should you consider the info that needs to be displayed: the route, certain side streets, relative distances, topography, restaurants, gas stations, hotels, campgrounds, etc. That's a lot of info! Getting all that info gathered in a region was good for me. I might view at a look how far I was from my camp, feed break, whatever. Now imagine all that crammed into 5 x 9 inch region that is viewable inside a bike chart owner. Obviously a conventional chart wouldn't function so effectively here. So these maps were drawn as line maps. This means the route they depicted was shown inside wise detail while surrounding regions were not. In various situations streets off the route were not shown at all. Now before I get worked upwards I should mention that bike maps need to be divided into screens. You only can't and do not want a much greater chart flapping about before we while you're biking. If you decide to did have something that has been much greater I'd call it a sail. Given the small space every panel was organized effectively. On the left had been a small section thatdetailed the route inside created instructions with the distance relative to the panel marked for each submit the route. These instructions included north bound plus southbound models. Also many maps a few of surrounding festivals, festivals, or parades listed at the lower. I not ever ran across these things inside the entire span of my travel. How might I ever visit the 'Slug Festival Parade' about the 3rd weekend of July? Unless I planned my trip to specifically visit the 'Slug Festival Parade.' In which case I don't think I'd need that small italic reminder. The size of every panel was taken up by the chart. The overall color strategy of the maps was green, black, grey, red, and naturally blue for water attributes. Good choice, especially contrasting. Now the green was divided into 5 shades, every representing the topography of the land. The darkest green was the lowland and also the lightest was the highland. That might sound wise however when we think regarding it separatingthe land into: low, med-low, med-high, plus excellent isn't absolutely all that helpful. The elevation was only marked inside 500 foot intervals so we might view a road that seemed like it didn't make an excessive amount of a climb and then find away it only didn't cross that wonder 500 foot interval. If we were riding light racing bicycles I suppose this wouldn't matter. I was biking a metal framed animal loaded with the best (understand heaviest) racks plus plenty of gear. Every slope I came across was substantial to me however evidently they weren't substantial to the chart brewers. The primary route was constantly a black plus red stripe, side streets were grey. That will be when they were included at all. If these people were included nearly all of the time they weren't described. Each submit the route was marked with a star which corresponded to a star inside the written text rendering of the route. Numerals might have been more helpful (all of the celebrities looked the same to me). Along with the celebrities the primary route additionally had black dots along it. The dots came inside sets. In the center of each set had been a amount which represented the distance involving the dots. The dots were placed at turns, businesses, villages, or other notable locations. These were especially helpful. Judging the distance till the next area to stop to have or sleep was all to easy to do only by hunting at the dots. With all that distance info how might you want for any more? Well should you were biking across 2 to three screens it might be nice to have those distances wouldn't it? Because they weren't marked I spent time every day adding up the distances between screens to plan the day's ride. A minor inconvenience I suppose however it is actually one that might have been conveniently remedied by leaving off a few of the useless info about the back of the chart. The last substantial feature of the maps were the places of interest. They were:bike shops, hostels, bed & breakfasts, libraries, campgrounds, ranger stations, restaurants, hotels, grocery stores, article offices, plus gas stations. The only other kinds I could have preferred to find were breweries plus coffee shops. These markers were the best attributes of the maps. These organization kinds accounted for everything we might ever want while on the street. Having them marked plus updated when they go bankrupt is a huge benefit. My only care is the fact that the quality isn't marked so it is actually easy to make your big stop at a organization that is less than suitable and then view a greater one further down the street. The reverse side of the panels was where all of the info not straight connected to biking the route along with certain more detail screens were located. The detail screens were selected when the route went from big towns were showing the route inside a prevalent scale wasn't practical. These detail screens would not display created instructions or topography. The other info about that side of the chart was certain general info regarding route conditions like traffic, climate, and also the route elevation profile. There was another directory of the many businesses marked about the chart which included their addresses plus telephone numbers plus field notes of the route. I used the company directory and also the elevation profile; I understand plus quickly forgot the climate/traffic conditions; plus never bothered in appearance the field notes. I wish the elevation profile was included about the side of the chart that has been noticeable while biking however it wasn't a fuss. Overall my undertaking with these maps had been a love/hate relationship. On one hand I had a lot of frustration with them. On the other I was able to accomplish this feat with especially small planning. Every day when I looked at the maps I'd consider how much I paid to them and just how I might make a computer program that interfaces with Google maps to produce the same factor. Plus I'd let everyone use it for complimentary! When I returned home within the trip I did only that. I trained myself, HTML, css, javascript, plus a bit of SEO. The product: Ride Free Bike Maps. It is a blog/web app combo for cyclists. The web app is a constantly growing piece of software tailored to take Google maps plus structure them so we might print them away and employ them inside a bike chart owner. The blog is where I post articles regarding cycling plus information in regards to the website. You may have one last doubt. Who did we get those bike maps from? I don't desire to fury anyone with a legal department so I'll keep that my secret. If you decide to wish to learn we should be able to identify them should you run across them inside your look for bike maps. Find More
Related Articles -
http://www.c2logix.com, www.c2logix.com, free routing software from c2logix, map route software, map routing software, c2logix map software, c2logix route o,
|