Amazines Free Article Archive
www.amazines.com - Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Read about the most recent changes and happenings at Amazines.com
Log into your account or register as a new author. Start submitting your articles right now!
Search our database for articles.
Subscribe to receive articles emailed straight to your email account. You may choose multiple categories.
View our newest articles submitted by our authors.
View our most top rated articles rated by our visitors.
* Please note that this is NOT the ARTICLE manager
Add a new EZINE, or manage your EZINE submission.
Add fresh, free web content to your site such as newest articles, web tools, and quotes with a single piece of code!
Home What's New? Submit/Manage Articles Latest Posts Top Rated Article Search
Google
Subscriptions Manage Ezines
CATEGORIES
 Article Archive
 Advertising (133268)
 Advice (160742)
 Affiliate Programs (34733)
 Art and Culture (73612)
 Automotive (145480)
 Blogs (74984)
 Boating (9837)
 Books (17129)
 Buddhism (4122)
 Business (1327905)
 Business News (426289)
 Business Opportunities (366242)
 Camping (10947)
 Career (72722)
 Christianity (15832)
 Collecting (11636)
 Communication (115036)
 Computers (241925)
 Construction (38956)
 Consumer (49617)
 Cooking (17054)
 Copywriting (6567)
 Crafts (18205)
 Cuisine (7532)
 Current Affairs (20367)
 Dating (45755)
 EBooks (19677)
 E-Commerce (48182)
 Education (185088)
 Electronics (83420)
 Email (6389)
 Entertainment (159757)
 Environment (28924)
 Ezine (3038)
 Ezine Publishing (5443)
 Ezine Sites (1552)
 Family & Parenting (110872)
 Fashion & Cosmetics (196366)
 Female Entrepreneurs (11839)
 Feng Shui (130)
 Finance & Investment (310191)
 Fitness (105758)
 Food & Beverages (62803)
 Free Web Resources (7936)
 Gambling (30211)
 Gardening (25056)
 Government (10513)
 Health (628942)
 Hinduism (2156)
 Hobbies (44025)
 Home Business (91542)
 Home Improvement (251191)
 Home Repair (46090)
 Humor (4797)
 Import - Export (5444)
 Insurance (45077)
 Interior Design (29540)
 International Property (3485)
 Internet (190947)
 Internet Marketing (146272)
 Investment (22822)
 Islam (1168)
 Judaism (1357)
 Law (80443)
 Link Popularity (4592)
 Manufacturing (20794)
 Marketing (98718)
 MLM (14136)
 Motivation (18208)
 Music (26993)
 New to the Internet (9475)
 Non-Profit Organizations (4048)
 Online Shopping (129601)
 Organizing (7796)
 Party Ideas (11852)
 Pets (38083)
 Poetry (2234)
 Press Release (12665)
 Public Speaking (5618)
 Publishing (7522)
 Quotes (2407)
 Real Estate (126594)
 Recreation & Leisure (95227)
 Relationships (87411)
 Research (16147)
 Sales (80291)
 Science & Technology (110111)
 Search Engines (23445)
 Self Improvement (153059)
 Seniors (6219)
 Sexuality (35931)
 Small Business (49274)
 Software (82908)
 Spiritual (23439)
 Sports (116451)
 Tax (7657)
 Telecommuting (34073)
 Travel & Tourism (306753)
 UK Property Investment (3117)
 Video Games (13420)
 Web Traffic (11722)
 Website Design (56767)
 Website Promotion (36554)
 World News (1000+)
 Writing (35748)
Author Spotlight
ALEN OWEN

I am an essay writer with vast experience in data analysis, PowerPoint writing and research paper ed...more
MARC DESCHAMPS

Marc Deschamps is a professional content creator and digital marketing entrepreneur. He runs a numbe...more
BRIAN WILSON

I am a qualified internet marketing professional and content writer with more than 10 years of exper...more
DERRICK REDE

I am Derrick Rede, glad to share the latest trends and solution to motorcycle loves. Motopartscente...more
SHOVON JOARDER

Shovon Joarder has been working as Freelance Marketing Project Manager for over four years. He also ...more


The 2009 California Changes to ESI Law by Steve Burgess






The 2009 California Changes to ESI Law by
Article Posted: 02/08/2015
Article Views: 1221
Articles Written: 36
Word Count: 1186
Article Votes: 0
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The 2009 California Changes to ESI Law


 
Law,Internet,E-Commerce
The 2009 California changes to law with regard to ESI The evolution of e-discovery and computer forensics, Part 4

In 2005 and 2006, the California Judicial Council proposed amendments for the California Rules of Court with regard to electronic discovery (ediscovery), but with Amendments to the Federal Rules set to be released in 2006, California held off on their own amendments in order to see how the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) would play out, and what guidance would be given on how to treat this new distinction in discovery.

Many states hurried to bring their own rules into line with the new Federal Rules, but California was now lagging. A leader in tech and the home of Silicon Valley had fallen behind nearly 20 other states in clarifying its rules about ESI, leaving the legal landscape in the West in some disarray. An attempt was made to pass new rules (Assembly Bill 926) in 2008, but was vetoed by then-governor, Arnold Schwartzenegger on September 27 of that year. The reason given was that he was "only signing bills that are the highest priority for California," by which he meant he wanted California to focus primarily (and almost solely) on its budget process, vetoing most legislation that did not deal directly with the budget.

Desperate for clarification, the California Judicial Council again recommended changes to the Civil Code in California, and the State Legislature passed the California Electronic Discovery Act to "eliminate uncertainty and confusion regarding the discovery of electronically stored information" ("ESI") and "minimize unnecessary and costly litigation that adversely impacts access to the courts." Put forth as an urgent measure, the bill was set to take effect immediately upon its signing. Although budget talks were bogging down much as they had in 2008 (and many other years), Governor Schwartzenegger signed the bill and it became force of law on June 29, 2009.

The California Electronic Discovery Act amended several parts of the California Rules of Court, bringing the state's rules somewhat in line with the 2006 Federal Amendments, but with several distinctions.

Perhaps new changes will be required when quantum computing becomes mainstream…

California's new Rules provide clarification as to what is not "reasonably accessible ESI," and for a party to object to ESI discovery "on the grounds that it is from a source that is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or expense." Now the responding party is required to "identify in its response the types or categories of sources of electronically stored information that it asserts are not reasonably accessible" and thereby "preserve any objections it may have relating to that electronically stored information.”

Incidentally, the vetoed 2008 Bill had not included this clarification to deal with resisting discovery. The Federal Rules differ in that they state, "A party need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the party identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost." It appears that the State rules make it a bit harder to resist discovery and production when it comes to ESI.

Given the tools available and proliferating in the areas of e-discovery and computer forensics, production of ESI is more straightforward in many cases, making it more difficult to resist production in some cases.

Rather than use the clawback provisions in Rule 26 of the FRCP to protect "privileged information," the CCP provides that if a producing party inadvertently produces privileged information, it may notify the receiving party, who then must "immediately" sequester the information and either return it or present it under seal to the court within 30 days for determination of the privilege issues.

Very similar to the FRCP, the CCP permits a court to limit the frequency or extent of discovery of ESI if the court finds that any of the following conditions exist: If the ESI can be retrieved from another source that is more convenient, less expensive, or less burdensome.

If the ESI is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative.

If the requestor has had ample time and opportunity to discover the information sought.

If the burden is likely to outweigh the benefit. The CCP specifically allows the responding party to object or move for a protective order on the grounds that the ESI being sought is "not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or expense." If an objection (rather than a protective order), there must be a written response identifying the "types or categories of sources" that it claims are not reasonably accessible, with "accessibility" being largely driven by expense or burden of converting, restoring, or manipulating the data so it can be produced in a reasonable form.

The burden of proof for showing that specific ESI is not reasonably accessible now falls on the responder, making it seem (to this author) that data is more likely to be seen by the court as being "accessible."

The CCP makes sanctions for destroyed data a little less likely, as long as the ESI was lost, damaged, altered, or overwritten as the result of the routine, good faith operation of an electronic information system. In other words, if evidence was lost by accident or oversight, sanctions may not be applied as they might for purposeful destruction or spoliation of electronic evidence.

Like the Federal Rules, the requesting party can, within limits, specify the form of production, but if it does not, the CCP provides that the responding part produce the ESI in the form in which it is ordinarily maintained, or that is reasonably usable. It need not produce it in more than one form.

Finally, if it is reasonably likely that ESI will be a part of the case, the new California rules require the parties to meet and confer within 45 days before the case, while initial case management meetings can be held within 30 days. Given that all documents start on a computer as electronically stored information, the 45-day rule seems likely in an ever-increasing number of cases.

The sections of the California Code of Civil Procedure amended were Sections 2016.020, 2031.010, 2031.020, 2031.030, 2031.040, 2031.050, 2031.060, 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240, 2031.250, 2031.260, 2031.270, 2031.280, 2031.290, 2031.300, 2031.310, and 2031.320, and Sections 1985.8 and 2031.285 were added.

Technology with regard to the Law is changing and evolving at an ever-increasing rate, and the Rules of Civil Procedure must continue to change to keep up and stay relevant to what comes before the Court. The Amendments discussed above are certainly not the final ones. In fact, changes are being discussed even now that may come into force in December of 2015. Some of the proposed changes make it even harder to apply sanctions for loss of evidentiary ESI. We will discuss some of the forthcoming proposed amendments to California's Civil Code in the next installment of this series.

Steve Burgess is a freelance technology writer & speaker, a practicing computer forensics specialist as the principal of Burgess Forensics, and a contributor to the text, Scientific Evidence in Civil and Criminal Cases, 5th Edition by Moenssens, et al. Mr. Burgess may be reached at Burgess Forensics or via email at steve@burgessforensics.com

Related Articles - e-discovery, electronic discovery, FRCP, computer forensics, CCP,







Email this Article to a Friend!

Receive Articles like this one direct to your email box!
Subscribe for free today!

 Rate This Article  
Completely useless, should be removed from directory.
Minimal useful information.
Decent and informative.
Great article, very informative and helpful.
A 'Must Read'.

 

Do you Agree or Disagree? Have a Comment? POST IT!

 Reader Opinions 
Submit your comments and they will be posted here.
Make this comment or to the Author only:
Name:
Email:
*Your email will NOT be posted. This is for administrative purposes only.
Comments: *Your Comments WILL be posted to the AUTHOR ONLY if you select PRIVATE and to this PUBLIC PAGE if you select PUBLIC, so write accordingly.
 
Please enter the code in the image:



 Author Login 
LOGIN
Register for Author Account

 

Advertiser Login

 

ADVERTISE HERE NOW!
   Limited Time $60 Offer!
   90  Days-1.5 Million Views  

 

Great Paranormal Romance

World News


GENE MYERS

Author of four books and two screenplays; frequent magazine contributor. I have four other books "in...more
LAURA JEEVES

At LeadGenerators, we specialise in content-led Online Marketing Strategies for our clients in the t...more
SUSAN FRIESEN

Susan Friesen, founder of the award-winning web development and digital marketing firm eVision Media...more
CHRISTOPHER EVANS

Christopher is based in the U.K. and is the author and founder of Critical Eye. ...more
STEVERT MCKENZIE

Stevert Mckenzie, Travel Enthusiast. ...more
MICHAEL MIFSUD

Michael Mifsud was a House of Commons Commonwealth correspondent at the age of 16. He published Brit...more
ROGER LEWIS FISCHEL

Roger Lewis holds a doctorate in language and literacy from a major midwestern university. His inter...more
STEVE BURGESS

Steve Burgess is a freelance technology writer, a practicing computer forensics specialist as the pr...more
ALEX GREENE

Alex Greene are Senior Editor at Sports Intensity, an online sportsbook review site dedicated to pro...more
AYAD ELHIMER

www.businbook.com is a website that provides listings for local businesses. He currently offers a wi...more

HomeLinksAbout UsContact UsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyFAQResources
Copyright © 2018, All rights reserved.
Some pages may contain portions of text relating to certain topics obtained from wikipedia.org under the GNU FDL license