|
One buzzword which is being bandied around quite a bit in recent times in regulation circles will be the deceptively simple"key performance indicators." Okay, so these KPI's, as people so like naming them, are pieces of information that will let you know precisely how well or poorly your organisation has been performing. Yet with the information around, how will you even begin to go ahead and determine which one of them deserve being called key performance indicators? For this problem, a strategy map would be the best and the most successful solution. Yes, one of the biggest hurdles in employing KPI's properly is precisely that surrounding selecting them in the first place. Information is widely identified for being probably the most key elements dictating success or failure in the commercial world today, a great number companies already have put information technology measures set up. Sometimes, however, it happens to be a lot of information that threatens to overwhelm human judgment and management. It becomes important to have some clear and understandable framework upon which to base judgements and around which to build morally correct, more robust system. Concerning business strategy and the use of KPI's, this framework is frequently called a strategy map, as defined by the "Pathfinder Evolution" system created by Compliance Consultant. Building this kind of strategy map begins with the most important objectives of the firm: its mission and vision. Those are the broadest, most rudimentary goals that the organisation hopes to achieve through its various activities. These are typically formulated at the company's inception, and fine-tuned throughout the history and progress of the company. Now, starting from these goals, each department and aspect of the company should then formulate their own individual goals. These sub-goals will be more specific, but should nevertheless be in line with the company mission and vision. Smaller parts should recommend their own objectives following from all of these sub-goals, and so forth. Of course, simply having lists of various goals won't be as useful as having a strategy map of the goals, with directional indicators in between them. And, in actual fact, this is actually the next step: forge the causal links between these various desired outcomes at every level. Generate the connections regarding the goals within a level and between different levels as clear as possible. This will not only help in deciding the proper key performance indicators to work with, but it will also serve to verify the validity of the goals being formulated. Because connections become clearer, it will also become clearer whether a particular goal is well-connected to the remaining company strategy or not. Finally, the end goal at this point is not the device or even the strategy map itself, but instead the deeper realisation that follows undergoing the procedure. If you take some time to elucidate company strategy with such detail, not only can the resulting strategy be much better, the members of the management would also obtain a deeper perception of the underlying reasoning. Hence, aside from a KPI system, managers may also be prepared to be considerably better grounded for making future important company decisions and judgment calls. If you are interested in Developing Your Own Strategy Map, go to http://www.complianceconsultant.org web-site to learn more about strategy "Pathfinder Evolution".
Related Articles -
balance score card, balance scorecard, balanced score card, balanced scorecard, bank set up, banking compliance, boe, bank of england, bsc, business continuity,
|
