|
(NaturalNews) U.K. authorities recently released a report entitled Global Food and Farming Futures which recommends that "new technologies" in agriculture not beexcluded merely on ethical or moral grounds. But Britain's ChiefScientist took this language and perverted it into an endorsementfor genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), despite the fact that amore credible report issued by the International Assessment ofAgricultural Knowledge, Scientific and Technology for Development(IAASTD) expresses quite the opposite concerning biotechnology in agriculture . Upon first release of the report, the U.K. mainstream media wentwild, falsely reporting that it proved the need for GMOs to feed the world, and that planting "Frankencrops" is the onlyway for agriculture to survive in the long term. And Beddingtonmade a series of ignorant and unscientific statements himself,suggesting that GMOs will solve the problems of water shortages andsalination, and that they are the "key to human survival." For being "Chief Scientist", Beddington seems to have a minimalgrasp on reality, let alone actual science . Twenty-five years of GMO research has yet to produce a single drought-resistant crop. Ithas also failed to produce a salt-tolerant crop, or any other cropthat outperforms conventional crops, for that matter. It has,however, increased pesticide use and multinational corporatecontrol over agriculture, though. Yet none of these facts stoppedthe "chief" or the media choir from blabbing their nonsensicalopinions about the alleged benefits of GMOs. The only thing the report actually illustrates is the fact that thecurrent industrial food system and its biotechnological leanings are taking us in thewrong direction. This was also the conclusion of thehighly-credible IAASTD report as well, which points towardsmall-scale, diversified agriculture as the real answer to theworld's food problems. According to GroundTruth , many of the "400 authors and contributors" to the Global Food and Farming Futures report did not even actually contribute to it. "I didn't participate in any meetings, discussions, findings, orreport writing," explained one scientist listed as a contributor. Instead, he was asked to write a reviewfor another publication. He added that GMOs were never mentionedanywhere in any of the material he dealt with, though, and thatthey were never the issue at hand. It turns out that a government advisory group actually funded thestudy with the purpose of convincing officials to keep an open mindto things like GMOs, and to contradict the IAASTD report. So thereport is nothing more than an unscientific, fraudulent propagandapiece that Britain's Chief Scientist and his country's mediarepertoire are using to advance a pro-GMO agenda, and nothing more. Sources for this story include: blog/gmo-apologists-ignore-science-again. We are high quality suppliers, our products such as Medical Eye Pad Manufacturer , Elastic Stretch Tape Manufacturer for oversee buyer. To know more, please visits Medical Wound Dressing.
Related Articles -
Medical Eye Pad Manufacturer, Elastic Stretch Tape Manufacturer,
|
